Illustration by Tom Bachtell
"The saddest part is that this Nobel Peace Prize winner died without seeing his lifelong dream of eternal war with Israel come to fruition." -- Ellen Carter, Travel Writer
This week's New Yorker has an article by David Remnick that explores (briefly) Yasser Arafat's net influence on the Israeli state vs. Palestinian nationhood dilemma. This article speaks to me more than most other breakdowns of this situation ever has. This could be because I am your basic casual news reader. The Times almost every day, the New Yorker when I can stand it, Harpers when I feel intellectual and Slate almost all the time. I'm equipped to do little more than parrot that which I read in left-leaning publications. This piece discusses an idea that is new to me, but probably not to most people who have made it their business to understand this Middle East situation-- that Yasser Arafat, for all of his militance and manifest destiny failed to realize any part of his dream of recognition and legitimacy for the Palestinian people. Remnick claims that Arafat embraced jihad when palatable alternatives were offered at Camp David and Taba. But, Remnick points out, Arafat
faced a Draconian choice. On the one hand, he could dispense with his dreams of driving out the Zionists and become the leader of the thirteenth-largest Arab state, a leader who would have to forgo the life of a media-age revolutionary and spend his remaining years dealing with matters of road-building, sewage, agronomy, tax collection—the tedious business of governance. At the same time, he would have to confront his people with the limitations of their future, particularly the divided status of Jerusalem and Israel’s refusal to commit demographic suicide by absorbing the Palestinian refugees from abroad.
To me, this is deep. Remnick is asserting that Arafat condoned jihad only to perpetuate his Che Guevara-like hold over his people rather than face the everyday drone of municipal bureaucracy as the leader of a legitmate state.
I am not well-informed enough to really address this. But I wonder if Arafat cancelled himself out by failing to leave a viable Palestinian legacy.